Recent American bombardment in the South American nation and the seizure of its president have ignited unease regarding America's designs on the Arctic territory. Followers of the ex-president's base have reportedly focused on the resource-rich landmass following the operations in the southern hemisphere.
Merely a short time after the initiation of the Caracas campaign, a prominent conservative commentator, who is the spouse of a high-ranking White House aide, shared a suggestive image. The graphic depicted Greenland covered in the stars and stripes, with the cryptic caption: "COMING."
This overt suggestion to absorb the resource-abundant region, which is a part of the North Atlantic alliance, provoked immediate and strong condemnation from Danish officials.
"We are strong partners and should keep work together as such. US security is also Greenland’s and Denmark’s security," declared the Danish ambassador to the United States. "Our nation and the US work together to guarantee security in the North."
The diplomat additionally highlighted that the kingdom had significantly increased its military budget this year, allocating a substantial amount specifically for Arctic and North Atlantic security. "And yes, we expect complete recognition for the territorial integrity of the our realm," he emphasized.
The tensions were further complicated by the previous appointment of a Southern governor as a representative to Greenland. The appointee had publicly thanked the commander-in-chief, stating it was an "honour" to work in a volunteer capacity to "make Greenland a part of the US."
After the events in Venezuela, this envoy commended the administration's actions, linking it to the wider "war on drugs."
Ever since assuming office, the American leader has consistently unnerved European allies with his expressed desire in Greenland. The island is viewed as vitally important for national security and future resource extraction. It currently houses the most northerly US military base.
In a significant media appearance, the president declined to rule out the resorting to armed action to gain control of Greenland. This position comes amid growing global rivalry in the Arctic. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he stated.
He described Greenland as having a "very small amount of people, which we’ll take care of, and we’ll cherish them... But we need that for international security."
In response to this persistent "drumbeat" of intent, Danish security agency took the unprecedented step last month of labelling the United States as a "security risk."
The prime ministers of Denmark and Greenland delivered a unified and stern statement: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You must not annex other countries."
Public opinion in Greenland reveals a complex picture. While a vast majority of the island's inhabitants desire self-rule from Denmark, there is also scant desire to become part of the United States. The territory has had the legal right to seek independence for many years.
Military experts are now reconsidering the possibility of such a move. One thinktank director focusing in defence conceded she had once discounted the rhetoric but was "currently not so sure."
"Logistically, it would be feasible for the US to deploy a couple hundred or a few thousand soldiers inside of Greenland, and it's not clear to me who could intervene about it," she observed.
Elena is a tax policy analyst with over a decade of experience in interpreting IRS data and advocating for taxpayer rights.